Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

How To Avoid Quadratic Computation Resulting From Double 'for Loop' When Computing Distances Between Vectors

Given the following code that computes distances between vectors in list 'vect’: import numpy as np vect=([0.123, 0.345, 0.789], [0.234, 0.456, 0.567],[0.134, 0.246, 0.831]) def

Solution 1:

To avoid duplicate pairs nested loop should go upwards from the index of the outer loop, i.e.:

for i, v1 in enumerate(vect):
    for j in xrange(i + 1, len(vect)):
        a = np.array(v1)
        b = np.array(vect[j])
        space = np.linalg.norm(b - a)
        print space

Or use a solution provided by the standard library:

import itertools

for v1, v2 in itertools.combinations(vect, 2):
    a = np.array(v1)
    b = np.array(v2)
    space = np.linalg.norm(b - a)
    print space

Solution 2:

Others have noted that you can't avoid the quadratic complexity. But if your concern is performance, you can speed things up considerably by using scipy.spatial.distance.pdist, which will have all the looping and function calling happen in C, not Python. The following code returns a square, symmetrical array, but it only makes n *(n-1)/2 calculations:

from scipy.spatial.distance import pdist

pairwise_distances = pdist(vect, metric='euclidean', p=2)

If you want a flattened array with only the unique, off-diagonal values, you can use scipy.spatial.distance.squareform:

from scipy.spatial.distance import pdist, squareform

pairwise_distances = squareform(pdist(vect, metric='euclidean', p=2))

In your case, pairwise_distances would be a 3 element long array.


Post a Comment for "How To Avoid Quadratic Computation Resulting From Double 'for Loop' When Computing Distances Between Vectors"