How To Interact With Python's Subprocess As A Continuous Session
Solution 1:
The basic reason subprocess
insists you use .communicate()
is because it's possible for deadlock to occur otherwise. Suppose you're writing to the process's stdin, while the process is writing to its stdout. If the pipe buffers fill up, the writes will block until a read occurs. Then you're both waiting for each other and no progress can be made. There are several ways to deal with this:
- Use separate threads. Assign one to stdin and the other to stdout. That way, if one pipe blocks, you're still servicing the other.
- Use
select
to multiplex over the pipes. Only interact with pipes which are ready for you. You should also enableO_NONBLOCK
on the pipes usingfcntl
, so you don't accidentally fill the buffers. Used correctly, this will prevent the pipes from ever blocking, so you can't deadlock. This doesn't work under Windows, because you can only doselect
on sockets there.
Solution 2:
In your specific case, the issue is that for each two lines that the child process prints, your parent process reads only one line. If you pass more names then eventually your processes deadlock after the OS pipe buffers have been filled up as @Kevin explained.
To fix it, just add the second child.stdout.readline()
to read the question before writing the name to the child process.
For example, here's parent.py
script:
#!/usr/bin/env python
from __future__ import print_function
import sys
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
child = Popen([sys.executable, '-u', 'child.py'],
stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE,
bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True)
commandlist = ['Luke', 'Mike', 'Jonathan', 'Exit']
for command in commandlist:
print('From PIPE: Q:', child.stdout.readline().rstrip('\n'))
print(command, file=child.stdin)
#XXX you might need it to workaround bugs in `subprocess` on Python 3.3
#### child.stdin.flush()
if command != 'Exit':
print('From PIPE: A:', child.stdout.readline().rstrip('\n'))
child.stdin.close() # no more inputassertnot child.stdout.read() # should be empty
child.stdout.close()
child.wait()
Output
From PIPE: Q: name => Q: what is your name?
From PIPE: A: name => A: your name is Luke
From PIPE: Q: name => Q: what is your name?
From PIPE: A: name => A: your name is Mike
From PIPE: Q: name => Q: what is your name?
From PIPE: A: name => A: your name is Jonathan
From PIPE: Q: name => Q: what is your name?
The code works but it is still fragile if the output of the child.py
processes may change then the deadlock may reappear. Many issues to control an interactive process are solved by pexpect
module. See also the code example linked in this comment.
I've changed child.py
to work on both Python 2 and 3:
#!/usr/bin/env pythontry:
raw_input = raw_input
except NameError: # Python 3
raw_input = inputwhileTrue:
print('name => Q: what is your name?')
name = raw_input()
if name == 'Exit':
breakprint('name => A: your name is ' + name)
Post a Comment for "How To Interact With Python's Subprocess As A Continuous Session"